Psychedelic Mortality Versus Other Drugs

Research
by the SPAN Leadership Team

Explore a groundbreaking study on drug harm using multicriteria decision analysis, highlighting the disproportionate impact of substances like alcohol compared to psychedelics such as LSD and psilocybin.

Rethinking Drug Safety Based On Mortality Statistics

As the discourse around drug use evolves, understanding the relative safety of psychedelics compared to widely accepted substances like alcohol, nicotine, and over-the-counter amphetamines is crucial. This blog post delves into the mortality rates associated with psychedelics, particularly psilocybin, and contrasts them with those of substances that are deeply ingrained in our society.

Key Takeaways

  • Comprehensive Evaluation: The study uses multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to assess the harm of drugs, offering a broader perspective that includes health impacts on users and societal effects.
  • Alcohol’s High Harm Score: Alcohol is identified as the most harmful drug, significantly impacting both individual health and society, which underscores the need for stringent public health strategies to manage its use.
  • Safety of Psychedelics: Psychedelics like psilocybin and LSD score low on both personal and societal harm scales, suggesting they are much safer compared to mainstream substances like alcohol and tobacco.
  • Implications for Policy: The findings challenge current drug policies, particularly the harsh penalties associated with psychedelic use, advocating for policy reform based on scientific evidence of harm.
  • Shift in Public Health Focus: The study suggests shifting focus towards reducing the use of high-harm substances like alcohol while reconsidering the legal status of psychedelics to better align with their actual risk profile.

Understanding Psychedelic Mortality and the Relative Harms of Drugs

In the realm of drug policy and public health, understanding the comparative harm of various substances is crucial. A groundbreaking study titled “Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis,” published by David Nutt, Leslie King, and Lawrence Phillips in The Lancet, offers compelling insights into this issue. This blog post delves into the study’s findings and explores their implications for our understanding of drug harm and policy making.

A New Approach to Assessing Drug Harm

Traditionally, discussions about drug harm are often skewed by societal and media perceptions, which do not always align with scientific evidence. The study by Nutt and his colleagues challenges these misconceptions through a rigorous scientific framework known as multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). This approach evaluates the harm of drugs across multiple dimensions, including health damage to users, mortality, impact on others, and broader societal effects.

Key Findings

The study’s results are revealing: substances like heroin, crack cocaine, and methamphetamine rank as the most harmful to individuals, owing to their high potential for addiction and their physical health impacts. However, when considering broader societal effects, alcohol emerges as the most harmful drug. This is due to its widespread use and the significant social, economic, and health burdens it imposes on others, including health care costs, family adversities, and community safety.

The Disparity Between Public Perception and Scientific Evidence

One of the study’s most striking conclusions is the discrepancy between the public perception of drug harm and the actual data. For instance, substances like LSD and mushrooms, often viewed with considerable societal skepticism, show remarkably low harm scores in both personal and social dimensions. This finding suggests that current drug policies, which frequently penalize the use of psychedelics, may be based more on cultural stigma than on objective harm assessment.

Implications for Drug Policy

The implications of this study are profound for drug policy. By providing a clear, evidence-based ranking of drug harms, the research supports a more nuanced approach to drug legislation and public health strategies. For policymakers, re-evaluating the legal status and penalties associated with less harmful drugs like psychedelics could lead to more effective health and social outcomes. Furthermore, the high harm scores associated with legal substances like alcohol and tobacco call for renewed focus on public health strategies aimed at reducing their use and mitigating their impact.

Reported Psychedelic Mortality Rates

In this study and many other studies that report on mortality rates by substance, psychedelics continue to fall well below other more commonly used substances like tobacco and alcohol for both harm to the individual and psycho-social harm to the community at large.

"Deaths from psychedelics are so rare, they aren't even visible when compared to deaths from tobacco, alcohol, murder and even lightning strikes. You are more likely to die from a lightning strike than from taking any psychedelic drug. This is because psychedelics, especially entheogens and natural substances, have no known long term physical side effects, and do not harm any of the body's organs. Deaths from psychedelics are so rare, it is impossible to find any figure for annual death rates for any country in the world." - Gustavo Serrano

Psychedelic Mortality: Psilocybin

Psilocybin, the psychoactive compound found in certain types of mushrooms, is known for its low toxicity and minimal risk of fatal overdose. Research and historical data suggest that deaths directly caused by psilocybin are extremely rare; there are no known cases of mortality.

Psychedelic Mortality: LSD

LSD (lysergic acid diethylamide) is another psychedelic with a very low physiological toxicity and a high safety margin. Deaths directly attributed to LSD overdoses are virtually nonexistent, although the substance can lead to hazardous behaviors if used improperly.

Psychedelic Motality: DMT

DMT (dimethyltryptamine), often used in religious ceremonies and known for its intense psychedelic experiences, also shows a very low risk of fatality from physiological overdose. Like other psychedelics, negative incidents typically stem from behavioral responses during the experience rather than the substance’s toxicity.

Conclusion: Psychedelic Mortality May Be Lower Than You Thought

The landmark study provides a clear, scientific basis for rethinking how society evaluates and responds to different drugs. For organizations like SPAN, which support  informed and safe decision making around psychedlic use, these insights are invaluable. They underscore the need for policies that are not only based on rigorous scientific data but also aligned with the actual risks and benefits of substance use.

Understanding and addressing the real harms of drugs, without prejudice, could lead to more effective health interventions and a more rational, humane approach to drug policy.

For those interested in reading the full study, it provides a comprehensive look at the methodology and detailed findings that could help inform more balanced drug policies. Read the full study here.

By shifting the conversation from stigma and perception to science-based evidence, we can hope to see significant advancements in the ways drugs are understood and managed in society.

FAQ

What is multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA)?

MCDA is a method used to assess the impact of drugs by considering multiple criteria. It evaluates both the harm to the user and the wider societal effects, providing a comprehensive view of the overall impact of different substances.

Why does alcohol rank as the most harmful drug in the study?

Alcohol is ranked as the most harmful drug due to its widespread use and the extensive social, economic, and health-related problems it causes, not only to users but also to others around them, including family members and the community at large.

Are psychedelics like LSD and mushrooms really safer than alcohol?

According to the study, substances like LSD and mushrooms have much lower harm scores compared to alcohol. They show significantly less risk to individual health and have minimal social repercussions, suggesting they are indeed safer in comparison.

How can this study influence drug policy?

The findings from this study could encourage policymakers to reconsider the legal status and regulatory approaches to various drugs, particularly psychedelics, which are often less harmful than legal substances like alcohol and tobacco. A more evidence-based approach to drug policy could lead to more effective public health strategies and harm reduction measures.

What should be the focus of future drug policy based on this study’s findings?

Future drug policies should focus on reducing the use and harm of the most detrimental substances, such as alcohol and tobacco, while reevaluating the strict regulations on psychedelics. Emphasizing harm reduction, public health, and scientific evidence could lead to more balanced and effective policies.

Did You Enjoy This Article?

Support Our Mission: Keep Psychedelic Education Accessible

Help us keep our resources free or low cost! Contributions from people like you help us continue working on quality education, resources, and event offerings to our community - and that is how we are making a difference in the world.

We are officially a 501c3, so all of your contributions are tax deductible.

Donate Now
Hands holding a plant, signifying growth

Quality, Science-backed Education For Safer Psychedelic Experiences

A medium sized logo for SPAN; green and blue triangles.

UP Next...

No items found.

Volunteer With Us

Volunteer with us ~ We would love to have you!

two companies collaborate together to build something great

TRAININGS,

EVENTS +

NEWS

Join our mailing list to stay connected and up to date.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.